New MobyGoal! We're aiming for 1,500 well documented Arcade games.

Crime and Punishment

Published by
Released
Platforms
MobyRank MobyScore
Apple II
...
4.0
Commodore 64
...
4.2
DOS
...
3.5
Not an American user?

Description

Crime and Punishment is a courtroom simulation, where you play the judge. The emphasis lies on deciding the punishment, rather than if the person is guilty or not - that has already been decided. The aim is to receive as many Gavels as possible (out of ten), by choosing the same sentence as a judge.

Cases range from perjury and theft right up to murder and rape. To help you make your decision, you can receive information about the crime. This includes the damage caused by the crime, the villain's background and personal circumstances, and his/her motive.

Be aware that the more information you ask for, the less gavels you receive. The AI can sometimes produce surprising choices of sentences.

Screenshots

Crime and Punishment Commodore 64 You can review facts without your score being affected
Crime and Punishment DOS Begin the Game (CGA)
Crime and Punishment DOS Title Screen (CGA)
Crime and Punishment Commodore 64 Yuk!

Part of the Following Groups

User Reviews

There are no reviews for this game.


The Press Says

There are no rankings for this game.


Forums

There are currently no topics for this game.


Trivia

Copy protection

The Commodore 64 edition, maybe others, held a clever easter egg to trip up casual pirates (meaning, the consumers who used fancy clone programs to replicate commercial game disks, not the people who wrote such fancy programs). Since the fancy cloners were in a continuous arms race against the copy protection schemes of game makers, one could never assume the fresh copy would work without actually testing it. Typically, just running the copy for a few seconds was sufficient, as most games in this era would refuse to start up at all should their copy protection mechanism detect end-user duplication. But woe to the one who copied THIS game at a friend's house, only to take it home and discover that although the false clone would run just fine, it would only ever offer one case to judge: "software piracy," for which the correct answer was always "death penalty."
Contributed to by Trypticon (6578), Martin Smith (63168) and Knyght (645)