So, where does that leave Star Rangers? Well, it's no Wing Commander, but it never claimed to be. It is a good space combat simulator, with some very well done game play and graphics. Its lack of variety and difficulty hamper its ability to enter the realm of the greats, but if your looking for a unique space combat simulator, you may want to give Star Rangers a shot.

read review

PC Player (Germany)

Mit Wing Commander 4 im Anmarsch wird es das solide, aber konventionelle Star Rangers schwer haben. Geduldige Weltraumpiloten warten erst einmal das Erscheinen des neuen Origin-Boliden ab.

High Score

På en rad väsentliga punkter misslyckas dock plagiatörerna - Star Rangers saknar Tie Fighters snygga grafik, tunga ljud och suveräna spelkänsla. Star Rangers är inte för den skull ett dåligt spel, men i konkurrensen med Tie Fighter står det sig slätt.

PC Games (Germany)

Wer Wing Commander 3 kennt, ist Besseres gewohnt und wirft nach einiger Zeit enttäuscht das Handtuch.

GameSpot

Overall, Star Rangers lacks the detail and depth that make an engaging space combat simulator. If you're looking for an inexpensive way to blow a few hours, it's not bad; but if you're looking for something special in graphics, sound, or story, you won't find it here.

read review

Our Users Say

Category	Description	MobyScore
Acting	The quality of the actors' performances in the game (including voice acting).	2.7
AI	How smart (or dumb) you perceive the game's artificial intelligence to be	3.0
Gameplay	How well the game mechanics work (player controls, game action, interface, etc.)	3.3
Graphics	The quality of the art, or the quality/speed of the drawing routines	3.0
Personal Slant	How much you personally like the game, regardless of other attributes	3.7
Sound / Music	The quality of the sound effects and/or music composition	2.7
Story / Presentation	The main creative ideas in the game and how well they're executed	2.7
Overall MobyScore (3 votes)		3.0