Brutal: Paws of Fury Reviews (Genesis)

Published by
Developed by
Released
Also For
Genre
Perspective
Visual
Gameplay
...
Critic Score
100 point score based on reviews from various critics.
2.7
User Score
5 point score based on user ratings.

User Reviews

There are no reviews for the Genesis release of this game. You can use the links below to write your own review or read reviews for the other platforms of this game.


Our Users Say

Category Description User Score
Gameplay How well the game mechanics work (player controls, game action, interface, etc.) 2.6
Graphics The quality of the art, or the quality/speed of the drawing routines 3.2
Personal Slant How much you personally like the game, regardless of other attributes 2.2
Sound / Music The quality of the sound effects and/or music composition 2.8
Overall User Score (8 votes) 2.7


Critic Reviews

MobyRanks are listed below. You can read here for more information about MobyRank.
70
GamePro (US) (Jan, 1995)
Brutal doesn't attempt to be a SF II or MK II clone - a refreshing change. Although it's not perfect, it offers good graphics and gameplay, but most importantly, the bite of originality.
60
Brutal has a very fresh idea (fighting as animals), but it really never comes together. The fighters are very appealing, but not being able to start with all the special moves somewhat hindered the excitement. Excellent graphics.
50
Sega-16.com (Apr 28, 2005)
The bottom line is that Brutal: Paws of Fury is the epitome of mediocrity, the essence of a mixed bag. It succeeds visually, but it fails in the audio department. It's a great game as far as personality and uniqueness goes, but as a fighter it falls short of its goal. Two positives, two negatives. You could certainly do far worse than Brutal, even in the fighter category, but you could also do far better. It's a cheap game, and it will even keep you entertained for a week or two, but it doesn't possess the depth and sheer fun-factor needed to make it a staple of your library.