MobyRanks are listed below. You can read
here for more information about MobyRank.
100
AppleLinks.Com
These minor quibbles aside, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone is certainly the most all-out fun game to come down the pike in quite a while. I can only hope that the game's success will encourage EA to rethink its cancellation of the online game. I mean, right now I just run around my yard, dressed in my hand-stitched (but utterly authentic!) Ravenclaw Quidditch robes, chasing a tennis ball. I look like a total goob.
60
JeuxMac.com
Ce jeu destiné aux plus jeune d'entre nous est plutôt bien réussi et procurera de bons moments à nos marmots.
La courte durée de jeu ne devrait pas freiner l’achat, donc à se procurer pour toute la famille ou à plusieurs !
58
Inside Mac Games (IMG)
While the adventure is quite entertaining, it is most definitely made for children. It simply won't fully stimulate most teen or adult gamers. Conversely, a 7 year old would probably play with a Harry Potter cheese log if it were advertised correctly. In short, this is not a horrible game, nor is it incredible. With such a rich palette of imagination to work with, the game developers took an easy way out rather than creating something revolutionary. Still, if you want a nice relaxing game to jump into, or your kids need something to do, hop onto Platform 9 3/4.
55
Mac Gamer
Harry Potter is not an awful rip-off as a blatant attempt to slap a licensing name on something to make a quick buck. Fans of Harry Potter will certainly enjoy the game. It's not the greatest experience with enough frustrations with gameplay, saving, and bugs to keep this title from rising to the top of the fray as an excellent over all game. But enough of me, let's tally up the points: Let's see... 40 to start minus... add 15... carry the one... mumble mumble... leaving us with a grand total of 55 points for Gryffindor. Not enough to win the house cup, I'm afraid. Rather, Harry Potter and the Sorcerer's Stone is lodged firmly into the middle ground between excellent and awful, leaving us with a solidly okay title.
| Category |
Description |
MobyScore |
| Acting |
The quality of the actors' performances in the game (including voice acting). |
2.0 |
| AI |
How smart (or dumb) you perceive the game's artificial intelligence to be |
2.0 |
| Gameplay |
How well the game mechanics work (player controls, game action, interface, etc.) |
2.0 |
| Graphics |
The quality of the art, or the quality/speed of the drawing routines |
2.0 |
| Personal Slant |
How much you personally like the game, regardless of other attributes |
2.0 |
| Sound / Music |
The quality of the sound effects and/or music composition |
2.0 |
| Story / Presentation |
The main creative ideas in the game and how well they're executed |
2.0 |
| Overall MobyScore (2 votes) |
2.0 |
User Reviews
There are no reviews for this game.