Written by  :  Joakim Kihlman (275)
Written on  :  May 16, 2004
Platform  :  Windows
Rating  :  1.2 Stars1.2 Stars1.2 Stars1.2 Stars1.2 Stars

1 out of 18 people found this review helpful

write a review of this game
read more reviews by Joakim Kihlman
read more reviews for this game


Microsoft=Bad entertainment.

The Good

The historical theme is quite nice. I'm not a historian but from what I can see it is more or less correct in it's historical descriptions (although "correct" is a bad word when talking about history, because history is not about facts but how we interpret what we THINK are facts). Anyway, this gives a somewhat educational touch to the game which I quite like.

The Bad

Well, the rest, more or less. There are no obvious flaws that jump at you when you start the game. It is just so... bleak. The graphics are boring to look at, and the menus would suit some Microsoft excell-program better. The illusion that you aren't just playing around with ones and zeros aren't there at all. It really feels like a computer programe, not some "alternative" reality. In short, there is no way in which I can ever feel involved in the game and that makes it uninteresting and boring, since the game is so depressingly slow. Most strategy games are slow, but when involving even the most slow-paced game becomes exciting (civilization is an excellent example). Age of Empires is just plain boring and depressing to look at. The graphics aren't bad in that sense, the game just looks bleak and uninspired. One of the most overrated games in the history of games, since it has virtually no entertainment value at all.

The Bottom Line

Well made, but oh so uninspired and boring. Bleak, boring and bad.