Arcanum: Of Steamworks & Magick Obscura

The Good
The gimmick behind Arcanum is that it’s a fantasy role-playing game with technological elements. Thus, a steam-driven train might take you past the burial grounds of a dragon, halfling thieves might shoot at you, or you could fight a mechanized spider in a dungeon illuminated by electric lights. This does not mean that magick and technology work in concert however. One of the many storylines in this game deals with the struggle between magick and technology. This plays out in several ways regarding character development and means that as you progress towards either technology or magick, your ability to use the oppositional skills wanes. And it draws interesting parallels to the often antagonistic struggle between science and religion in our world.

So the question then, is how well does the gimmick work? Like the Fallout series, Arcanum presents a class-less role-playing system. As your character progresses you may specialize in thief-type skills, magic ones, etc. and through this create your class. Unlike Fallout, as a fantasy game you have your pick of races including human, elf, dwarf, and orc. These races have unique benefits and detriments and some close off gender options- Gnomish women, for example, are never seen. Arcanum does not make use of Fallout’s SPECIAL attribute system, but presents a similar one, which like Fallout, really affects game play. Most RPG’s don’t well integrated attribute systems, but every statistic in Arcanum really affects gameplay. Intelligence determines conversation options, Beauty affects how people react to you and Dexterity determines how fast you move. There are also statistics such as hit points and fatigue which are based on combinations of attributes and the level of your attributes determines how far you can advance in certain skills.

Which brings me to the skill section, which is the most complex system I’ve seen in any RPG. The skill set is broken down into three sets: character skills, magic skills and technological skills. These sets are then broken down into subsets such as combat, specific magic school or specific technological discipline. As you advance in level you apply points to these skills to increase your ability. You can also receive training in the character skills and advance from Apprentice to Expert to Master. Often training is purchased, but Master’s require special quests. Now you can also apply points to your attributes and you only receive one point per level. Therefore, deciding how to spend these precious points becomes strategic.

One final thing regarding the character: alignment. Your character begins the game with a neutral alignment. Depending on your actions (the quests you complete and your interaction with people) your alignment will shift towards good or evil. This is a dynamic system which does away with the complications of the traditional AD&D system and works very well within the game.

Actual game play resembles other RPGs, perhaps too much. You go on many mini-quests while uncovering the larger story. Talk to dozens (hundreds) of people and gain followers. Opinion of the usefulness of the followers seems to be mixed, but I felt like mine were great characters that did far more than carry heavy equipment. I was never able to make use of my dwarven technologist, but I think this was more my fault than his. They have wonderful conversations, fought very well, had interesting reactions between themselves and added to my enjoyment of the game.

There are many areas to explore and several major cities. Talking to the people in the cities results in useful information and interesting quests. During the game I played, I had to solve several murders, track down missing nobles and I found a fun X-Files themed conspiracy regarding half-orcs. There was seldom a time when I did not have at least one quest to work on and I usually had several on the backburner.

Graphically, this game is dated since it does not use 3D graphics, the graphics are good but result in some performance issues. Sound is wonderful. The string score is beautiful, voice work is consistently well above average and ambient noises are realistic and appropriate.

This is a very long game but highly replayable. As a non-thief character, I missed the extensive thieves’ underground, as a melee character I never got far into magic use and technology, and as a good character I didn’t touch on the dark side of Arcanum (however I did perform some evil acts for the greater good and some of my good acts resulted in bad outcomes). Finally, like the Fallout Series, at the end of the game, you get to see how your adventures affected the places you went traveled to.

The Bad
While the story in Arcanum was very good, it is unclear for most of the game. I think I prefer games where you know what points is from the get-go. Several major themes seem to disappear near the end of the game including the one with hero/villain technologist Gilbert Bates (Bill Gates?). Although, this could just be how I played the game. I also wished for more of the steam-punk, Victorian fantasy setting that the box seemed to advertise. While there was a mix of magick and technology in the game, most of the Arcanum world is entrenched in a pseudo-Tolkien setting. Pratchett’s Discworld books present a similar idea more convincingly.

The attribute/skill section I described above is very complex and since the game has a level cap it pays to plan ahead. I was very unhappy with the level cap because I wanted to do more with my character and if you can’t advance in level any more- why go on quests? I found myself very apathetic towards the end of the game, tired of the subquests and solely interested in the end of the game.

Of course one of the reasons for the level cap is the extremely poor balancing in the game. I was simply too powerful too soon. I was also very wealthy, so money oriented quests didn’t matter and I had all the items I wanted. While the ability to increase your attributes was fun, I was able to become almost superhuman. I think they needed to reconsider this element in favor of the traditional RPG feeling that attributes are carved in stone and only acts of God can change them.

While I mentioned some interesting quests, too many of them involved searching dungeons for a person/item. With all the dungeon crawling combat, you level up way too quickly. In short, elements of this game suffered from the Monty Haul syndrome discussed in AD&D books. RPGs have to be about more than who has the more points/gold, etc. By the time I got to the final battle, it was a joke. I was successful in a few minutes and never felt in any danger. The story and framework of Arcanum deserve more than a Cheaterz Diablo-type romp.

Finally, I mentioned that graphics were outdated. On my new system, I experienced several lock-ups because the game wasn’t making use of my 3D card. Characters weren’t particularly well animated, combat animations were minimalist, and the dungeons were visually unimpressive. There were some excellent rendered scenes, but they occur late in the game.

The Bottom Line
I played this voraciously and still don't know how I feel about this game. I definitely want to replay this game as a completely different type of character. As it stands now, I'd describe it as a failed masterpiece.

The Good
This review is long. I apologize; I didn’t intend to waffle. If you decide not to read this because of its length, I perfectly understand you, and probably would immediately join you for a beer. But for the sake of my favourite genre, role-playing games, I have to explain in detail the errors of Arcanum. Because they are legion, and because they are fundamental. And now that you’ve made it this far, you could actually go on and read the whole text.

The Bad
Know this then: Troika Games consists of the people who created Fallout. Fallout was, and is, one of the most perfect role-playing games ever designed.
It is important to know these two things to understand the scope of Arcanum’s failure. Because everything that Fallout did right, Arcanum does wrong. On the plane of consciousness on which the game was created, which is certainly not our own, this might even be some sort of achievement.

Arcanum is not a bad game. In a certain respect, I wish it were; you can feel pity for the cripple, but a bore moves no one. As it is, it is hard to understand how Troika could have the cheek to publish a game that is so obviously outdated without making absolutely, perfectly certain that there is a healthy body under the rags. Instead, the garb covers a slip of a game dragging itself along.

Enough grumbling already. Let’s hear the facts.

I will never tire of stressing the brilliance of the Fallout skill system; in my book, it can hardly be improved. Arcanum exemplifies this point nicely, as they tried. To be fair, Arcanum’s skill system is still its strongest point; the specialization works reasonably well (although the game not nearly enforces it well enough), and the tinkering with technology is great fun. However, Troika confused quantity for quality and bred confusion. The problem is really simple: you have so many choices that you cannot decide on one. This might be called freedom, if it wasn’t for the game’s lack of guidance. You can only guess which skills might be useful; in fact, many aren’t at all. Any master gamblers out there? More: Why is there one point for all talents? Fallout showed how a wise structuring of skill areas can greatly improve comprehensibility. Why must the basic skills be changeable? That makes your character a wobbly turncoat instead of a clearly defined specialist. Why do Arcanum characters level up so frequently? This greatly diminishes the overall importance of levelling. If you play Arcanum and understand why freedom is not always a boon, the game may have a purpose after all.

Arcanum is the Might & Magic of 2D role-playing games: lots of insignificant quests, almost insulting in their stupidity, piling up like trash along the main road. I have nothing against a variety of challenges, but I demand exactly that: variety and challenge. At best, I hope for side-quests that arise naturally out of the game world and are motivated through the plot. Look at Baldur’s Gate 2, for example, where the desperate need for ransom money forces you to do menial tasks, or where you are – brilliant idea! – unexpectedly offered quests that concern one of your party members. Disappointingly few of Arcanum’s quests are sensible in this way, even less are remotely interesting.

Even worse, this is also true for the dungeon mission, regardless whether they are plot elements or not. Sad highlight is the Tarant sewer, an endless maze of blue-grey tunnels in which the designers threw in monsters at random, but forgot to throw in some sense as well. Even the randomly created dungeons of Diablo are more varied (and a lot more thrilling) than the hand-made corridor deserts of Arcanum. Pinch me, maybe I’m ungrateful. Probably it’s asked too much that dungeons are exciting, and an extra dose of enemies always makes up for the lack of those other things, wosname… puzzles.

You might not have noticed, but you have companions. Yeah, the guys that join your group until the next fight, when they die. Party members can be a great utility to increase a game’s depth. Take a look at Baldur’s Gate 2 once again to see how gripping a cleverly designed party can be. But try and answer me this question: What good are the companions in Arcanum? Please, this is serious, think! My little brother has put it perfectly in one word: packhorses. They carry around extra stuff. That’s all. And that’s sad. Generally spoken, companions could, and should, serve two purposes: contribute useful additional abilities to broaden the choice of actions, and enrich the atmosphere. The second job is more important and generally paid less attention. The Arcanum companions serve neither purpose, as their talents are of little value (Virgil has not opened one single lock successfully for me, Magnus can build utilities that I don’t need, and so on), and they follow you around speechless like zombies, when they could enhance the atmosphere so much by commenting on each situation, quest or person -- a huge chance wasted. If a game feature is useless, then it should either be improved or removed.

Oh, the fights. I cannot help but think that Troika would have preferred doing without. The battle system of Arcanum is, well, functional. It serves it purposes, i.e. killing evil guys. Sorry to insist, but I have another question: Why do you fight in Arcanum? I believe there is an answer to this question on a general level, but it doesn’t apply to Arcanum or to many other games. Somewhere along the line of RPG creation, the purpose of battles must have been lost. Fights should first and foremost be challenges. Tactical challenges. A good RPG fight is always a matter of superior intelligence against superior strength. Only then can a battle be thrilling and rewarding. It doesn’t matter whether the strategy is correct use of weapons, spells, formation, action points, timing, you name it; what matters is that you can use it, and that you can win by using it correctly. The Fallout fights were tactical in their use of action points, weapon choice and targeting system; no surprise that they were refined into a full-fledged strategy game (Fallout Tactics). In Arcanum, battles serve only the two lesser purposes: as obstacles and delays (a use which sooner or later exhausts the players’ patience), and as a means of acquiring experience points. Hey, think hard, was there a memorable fight in Arcanum? On second thought, don’t strain your memory.

If you played Arcanum, you probably know that there is a skill cap at level 50. I find the necessity for caps dubious on principle, but in Arcanum it is actually understandable: Your hero simply grows too strong too fast. This is only one of the effects of bad balancing. There are many more. Take the plot, for example. Actually, the story of Arcanum could be quite interesting. Unfortunately, it is stretched so thin over the first half of the game (up to the Isle) that it hardly moves at all. Especially in the beginning of the game, a fast pace is essential to wake and bind the player’s interest. In short: things need to happen. In Arcanum, things happen very, very slowly, and those that do are not really thrilling (“Oh, you found me! Now search that mine”). So, the plot would have needed tightening. Also, as a friend of mine pointed out very rightfully, the program does nothing to encourage a decision for either magic or technology. Again, don’t mistake that for freedom. A strong, early opposition of forces would not only create dramatic tension, it would also increase the replayablity a great deal -- after all, you’d like to see the other side, too. But again, a chance had, a chance thrown away.

Lastly, and most importantly, there is the issue of technology. Mind you, I can live with Arcanum’s graphics, even though I feel that sting when I look at the other games on the store shelf and the 40 bucks in my hand. But what I cannot live with is the game’s speed. In fact, to publish a game that looks like a mid-90’s relic and jerks like a slide show on a PIII is an unbelievable impudence. I don’t know what technical challenges the programmers faced, and I don’t care; I expect a working product for my money. If a TV salesman told me “Did I say constant viewing? Well, it shows static every few seconds, of course”, he’d see static for more than a few seconds. This technical botch-up is not only unnerving, it is also a genuine mood-killer; if the screen is drawn once a second, I can no longer enjoy the illusion to explore the exiting city of Tarant, but I am constantly reminded that I’m sitting at my desk and staring at a computer.

Thank you for your patience. If you were clever, you scrolled down directly to this paragraph in expectation of a summary. Here it is: Arcanum is a mediocre game in every respect, as it disregards basic guidelines that every game, especially role-playing games, should follow: pace and flow, guidance and soft pressure, depth without confusion, atmosphere and credibility, and especially, meaning. Meaning in a computer game? Not in the philosophical sense, not necessarily. But in a down-to-earth, every-day sense: telling the player what he has to do, and why. If there is meaning, what follows is motivation.

The Bottom Line
A huge disappointment for RPG fans, Arcanum tries to fly to the stars with a wooden rocket. Compared to Fallout, Arcanum is not one step, but a fair afternoon walk backwards. How on earth this could happen is beyond me; if anybody knows and is willing to tell, he could restore a distressed man’s sleep.

The Good
Arcanum directly continues the role-playing tradition of Fallout games, creating a similar RPG experience in its own original world.

Just like Fallout, Arcanum is a highly flexible, open-ended game, a whole world with vast possibilities and nearly unlimited freedom to role-play. In this game, you are what you want to be. Feel like talking your way out of any situation, charm people and have a huge party? Increase charisma, beauty, and intelligence, but be prepared for some tough combat. Want to talk like an idiot, but be a walking tank? Create a character with 3 points of intelligence and with maximum strength and constitution, and he'll talk grammatically incorrect English, but will beat the crap out of everybody who dares to stand on his way. You can be a good person, perform only good deeds, save families, towns, and kingdoms, or you can be a bad guy, shooting innocents on the streets and making deals with criminals and maniacs obsessed by world domination. You can be a powerful magic user, wielding ancient swords and defending yourself with an enchanted buckler, or you can be a skilled mechanic, make guns and rifles, and drift along with the new epoch of technology. In short, this is a game where you can do what your want, but you also have to deal with the consequences of your behavior.

But with all this freedom, Arcanum doesn't lose the track of its story, which is excellent, especially if we realize this is not a Japanese RPG that is all story and no role-playing, but a game that strives primarily to offer the player the ultimate experience of customizing, exploring, and experimenting. With all its heavy role-playing and its open-ended nature, Arcanum has an interesting, suspenseful story full of surprising twists and philosophical speculations.

The role-playing system in Arcanum corrects many things that were a bit underdeveloped in Fallout. You can raise your main stats, which is good. No more running around with measly 5 intelligence and eating drugs as the only mean to raise it somehow. Fight, perform quests, level up, and watch how you turn into a super-powered muscle mountain, or a respectable sage. Of course, there are also plenty of skills to develop in Arcanum. Whoever says most of the skills aren't necessary, like for example the gambling, probably preferred killing the ultra-tough undead pirate Pete with his skeletons, or performing his three tedious quests, instead of simply winning the ship you need, which you can do only if you are a master gambler. This is the beauty of this game: there are so many unique ways to shape your hero that you are likely to lose yourself entirely in all this experimenting. And think of its replay value!..

In an interesting twist, Arcanum offers three types of combat engines the player can select right from the beginning: real-time, semi-turn-based, and turn-based. Personally, I prefer the turn based combat, which I didn't find slow at all. It was more or less the same style as in Fallout clever, intelligent kind of combat, based mainly on strategy. You have action points which determine the amount of actions you can perform per turn. You also have practically no control over your party members. Of course, they would do stupid things sometimes, but I found the ones in Fallout much more stupid - they couldn't use almost any good weapons, didn't wear good equipment, and were sometimes shooting me instead of the enemies. Having Virgil in your party makes the combat much more comfortable, because his healing skill is extremely powerful, and he does use it when I need help. In general I found the battles in Arcanum to be on the easy side, but that only added to the immense amount of fun I was already having with this game.

Your party members in Arcanum are perhaps not as memorable as in Planescape: Torment, but to call them packhorses is an insult. Of course, just as in Fallout, they really make great packhorses, but have you ever seen a packhorse who falls in love with you? Or a packhorse who believes you are the incarnation of an ancient elven hero? Or a packhorse who will tell you how cruel you are if you kill an innocent person, threatening to leave your party for good if you do this again? Or a packhorse that was once the mighty ruler of dwarves, with a tragic, philosophical story behind? No, they are not packhorses, but great companions on your quest, and there a lot of them, too.

The interesting setting of Arcanum makes the already masterfully crafted game even more appealing. It is a unique mixture of technology and magic, but not in the sense of "science fiction magic", like in some Japanese RPGs, but a kind of an alternate Earth: "steampunk" era, similar to the end of the 19th century in England or North America. The game captures the atmosphere of the time, the clothes, the speech, the social structure, and paying attention to the smallest details - interior design of rooms, the growing power of technology, the general rise of activity among people, the desire to conquer and discover more, old-fashioned planes and trains, names of streets, the fight between the old and the new, etc.

Yet this realistic epoch is mixed with a world that strongly reminds of Tolkien's Middle Earth, populated by elves, dwarves, and orcs. All those creatures have now to deal with the development of technology by the humans, and to solve the problem in their own ways. Arcanum manages to seamlessly merge those two completely different worlds.

Just to illustrate how much detail was put into the game: try reading all those books scattered around the world of Arcanum. One of the books is called "The Orc Question", and the author discusses in a typical haughty manner of an English Victorian gentleman what to do with the orcs, how to deal with them, and whether they are really such villains as most people say they are. This book is interesting not only due to obvious parallels to our own reality, but also because the unique style of the 19th century European essays has been carefully preserved here.

Lastly, the music of Arcanum is outstanding, and deserves to be released on a special CD. The whole soundtrack is performed by string instruments. Without too many effects, limited by its intimate instrumentation, this music is both tender and deep, threatening and meditative, emotional and calm, and has a flavor of deep melancholy. The high-quality music of Arcanum can nearly be compared to pieces by Shostakovitch or Bartok.

The Bad
The graphics are functional, but that's all they are. Of course, RPGs are seldom distinguished by their graphics, but it's a real pity that outdated visuals attracted negative attention to the game. Such is the world we live in: games are often judged by their "clothes".

I couldn't get into the real-time combat. I found it way too fast and confusing. The game was clearly developed with the turn-based combat in mind; looks like the real-time one was added as an afterthought.

The game opens with a beautiful CG movie; there are a few others in it, but too few for my tastes. A game with a narrative of this quality could have been more cinematic, pay more attention to dramatic depiction of events.

Oh, and I almost forgot: the level cap! I rarely reach those when I play RPGs; but when I played Arcanum, I hit it at some point before venturing into the final location. Luckily, there is a "level cap remover" floating on the net somewhere; be sure to apply it!..

The Bottom Line
Arcanum is the spiritual heir to Fallout games. Like its famed predecessors, it is a remarkably open-ended game with meticulous customization and nearly unlimited possibilities to role-play. Set in a highly original "Tolkien steampunk" world and offering an interesting, well-written story, Arcanum is a true delight for the RPG gourmet.