🕹️ New release: Lunar Lander Beyond

Forums > Off Topic > Windows 3.x under DOSBox (under WinXP)

user avatar

Pseudo_Intellectual (66362) on 11/29/2006 1:22 AM · Permalink · Report

In the interest of the pursuit of further authenticity into my old game inquiry, I've determined that old Windows games will probably look, feel and behave more the way they were intended in an old Windows environment than in a new one. I've got my install disks together (Win for Workgroups 3.11) and managed to get the sucker to install, but it won't run, getting just past the splash screen before crashing out with the error message <tt>ERROR: Unsupported expanded-memory driver already installed. Remove the driver from CONFIG.SYS</tt> -- this even after I've REMarked out every line from the dosbox config.sys

My suspicion is that I need to get into DOSBox's settings and tweak them to better accommodate Windows. Any suggestions?

user avatar

Foxhack (32100) on 11/29/2006 2:49 AM · Permalink · Report

Actually, last I heard, Windows 3.x was not supported due to incomplete emulation... but it was -getting there-.

What I do is fire up an old copy of Virtual PC, run a Windows 95 system, and play there.

user avatar

Pseudo_Intellectual (66362) on 11/29/2006 9:17 AM · Permalink · Report

Actually, last I heard, Windows 3.x was not supported due to incomplete emulation... but it was -getting there-.

It may not be 100%, but, uh... this is not the first place I checked. a thread elsewhere suggested that it could at least up and run, if nor necessarily run all programs reliably. I would have inquired there further, but the denizens looked more than a little ornery and my suspicion is that there may be some here also who have already addressed this conundrum 8)

What I do is fire up an old copy of Virtual PC, run a Windows 95 system, and play there.

A step outside my experience, but maybe an avenue I ought to investigate.

user avatar

Servo (57070) on 12/1/2006 5:58 PM · Permalink · Report

It can be done, but only in VGA mode or less I believe. It's definitely not supported though.

I've gotten it to work myself, but I didn't encounter that error so I don't know a solution offhand...

user avatar

Pseudo_Intellectual (66362) on 12/1/2006 8:05 PM · Permalink · Report

I've gotten it to work myself, but I didn't encounter that error so I don't know a solution offhand...

It's frustrating, as I've had proof that it can get 99% of the way there... while finalising the installation it got far enough into Windows to pop up all the folders and populate them with the application icons... then DOSBox crashed out. I hope that didn't happen when the installation wasn't yet complete, because there's not much I can do about that.

user avatar

ungibbed (8) on 12/8/2006 8:15 PM · Permalink · Report

Even under Virtual PC for Windows, Windows 3.1 becomes nightmarishly unstable after you install the supporting drivers for the emulated hardware (SB 16 and S3 graphics). Running old games on Win95 seems to work a bit better but as said, it's not a "perfect" environment.

user avatar

Foxhack (32100) on 12/8/2006 9:09 PM · Permalink · Report

Yep, if the game relies on direct hardware access (like so many games of the era did), it'll crash.