Knight Orc Reviews (Amiga)
There are no reviews for this game.
Our Users Say
|Graphics||The visual quality of the game||3.0|
|Personal Slant||A personal rating of the game, regardless of other attributes||2.8|
|Story / Presentation||The main creative ideas in the game and how well they are executed. This rating is used for every game except compilations and special editions which don't have unique game content not available in a standalone game or DLC.||3.0|
|Text / Vocal Parser||How sophisticated the text/vocal parser is for games that use text or voice as input.||3.0|
|Overall User Score (5 votes)||2.9|
Critic ReviewsMobyRanks are listed below. You can read here for more information about MobyRank.
Commodore User (Sep, 1987)
Gone are the rather rudimentary and meaningless ‘representations’ replaced by ‘digitised’ pictures. Amiga owners get the best of the deal here, for there is more colour per picture on that machine than the others – including the Atari ST. But it is the mode of play that has changed most dramatically. No longer do you have to make a map, and slavishly follow it move by move to return to a place you have visited earlier. No longer do you have to remember where you dropped an object that you may need later. All that is required is that you know which object you need, or which location you want to reach. If that makes playing Knight Orc sound dead simple, then forget it! To offset the ease of operation, the adventure is endowed with more than its fair share of independent characters, with minds of their own, who get in your way, grabbing the very item you are looking for, and attack you with relentless determination.
Your Amiga (Jan, 1988)
Having spent many hours playing this game I must admit that I didn't actually finish it; I'm not sure that I want to finish wandering about this strange new world inside my Amiga. Of all the Amiga adventures I have played this is the best - try it and see.
The Good Old Days (Staff Reviews only) (May 09, 2020)
Where does all this leave Knight Orc today? It is a game which reeks with ambition. In places, it feels like it was ahead of its own time by decades. In its best moments, like when its protagonist spits out a particularly cruel description of something, it will make you laugh out loud in surprise. But then, when some unexpected roadblock shows its ugly head, it also can't be denied that in spite of all its comfort features (with commands such as GO TO or FIND), it's not a very smooth playing experience. It's a game which is important, in spite of never really becoming influential. It may not be a must-play, arguably not even a must-know, but for sure it's a must-know about.
Computer Gaming World (CGW) (Apr, 1988)
The puzzles are too uneven. Part one can be finished off in an afternoon, while some puzzles in part two will take that long even if you have the hint sheet! When random bad luck can spoil a well thought out solution, it's hard to be sure if you're on the right trail. On the other hand, this game has the best parser I've seen in a while. Special options (available on the more powerful computers) speed the game along. The "oops" command returns you to where you were before the last move (you can keep using this command and move backwards through the game!). RAM save makes life easier, but with the "oops" command, it's almost redundant. Overall, the game rates a strong recommendation. While it has negative points, it is certainly above average.