Double Dragon Reviews (Atari 2600)
|Sure, good programming can do anything on any hardware . . . if you're Capcom, not Activision!!||Fake Spam (94)|
|A Very Bad Port||powerstone05 (349)|
Our Users Say
|AI||The quality of the game's intelligence, usually for the behavior of opponents.||-|
|Gameplay||How well the game mechanics work and the game plays.||2.9|
|Graphics||The visual quality of the game||3.1|
|Personal Slant||A personal rating of the game, regardless of other attributes||3.1|
|Sound / Music||The quality of the sound effects and/or music composition||3.5|
|Story / Presentation||The main creative ideas in the game and how well they are executed. This rating is used for every game except compilations and special editions which don't have unique game content not available in a standalone game or DLC.||2.3|
|Overall User Score (12 votes)||3.1|
Critic ReviewsMobyRanks are listed below. You can read here for more information about MobyRank.
All Game Guide (1998)
One has to give Activision credit for trying to release such a game for the VCS this late in the console's life span. And as well-known as Activision was for expanding the graphics palette of the VCS, Double Dragon is graphically below par -- even for that console. In the end, Double Dragon is more of a collector's item.
Retro Archives (Nov 30, 2018)
On ne va pas faire ici un procès à l’antique console d’Atari qui faisait déjà office de grand-mère vidéoludique en 1988: techniquement, porter Double Dragon sur cette console est un véritable exploit, qui a été réalisé avec brio. Malheureusement, du point de vue du joueur de moins de cinquante ans, il faut bien avouer que cette version ne pourra pas soulever grand chose de plus qu’un sourcil interrogateur, le temps de lui consacrer deux minutes, et sans doute pas une de plus. À réserver aux curieux.
Retro Game Reviews (Apr 28, 2016)
Double Dragon is a brave attempt to bring the Arcade classic onto the underpowered Atari 2600 but it's a shoddy port with irritating A.I. and lacklustre gameplay. The haphazard programming means it's almost unplayable and overall it's easily the worst version of the game I've experienced so far!
HonestGamers (Staff reviews only) (Jul 21, 2004)
But the saddest thing about this mess is that it could probably have turned out fairly well if you could actually get anywhere, something that should have become hopelessly apparent after even five minutes of actual play testing. To its credit, Double Dragon is still a lot better than luminaries like Knight on the Town – although pulling rank over anything in which the main character’s genitals are gnawed off by a hungry alligator probably isn’t the best choice of potential achievements. As such, ultimately this game is best left as a curious conversation piece . . . but not much of one.
Digital Press - Classic Video Games (Sep 25, 2004)
Sometimes you just have to admit a system has limits. Taking an arcade game that needed to be dumbed down for even the most advanced consoles on the market and trying to cram it onto the 2600 is NOT a wise decision. Still, someone obviously thought it was a brilliant move over at Activision, releasing a game that could very well be considered torture in a foreign country.
Woodgrain Wonderland (Dec 26, 2016)
As such, Double Dragon is virtually unplayable and easily ranks among the worst games for the system ever released by a generally reputable company. They really shouldn’t have bothered.
The Video Game Critic (May 14, 2001)
I'd recommend joining a gang before I'd recommend buying this game. Besides, all the cool kids are doing it.