Romance of the Three Kingdoms Reviews (DOS)
|Thankfully in this series, the first was the worst.||Indra was here (20900)|
Our Users Say
|AI||The quality of the game's intelligence, usually for the behavior of opponents.||4.0|
|Effectiveness||How effective a game is to teaching. This genre is only used for games with the genre Educational.||4.1|
|Gameplay||How well the game mechanics work and the game plays.||4.1|
|Graphics||The visual quality of the game||4.1|
|Personal Slant||A personal rating of the game, regardless of other attributes||4.4|
|Sound / Music||The quality of the sound effects and/or music composition||3.6|
|Story / Presentation||The main creative ideas in the game and how well they are executed. This rating is used for every game except compilations and special editions which don't have unique game content not available in a standalone game or DLC.||4.2|
|Overall User Score (8 votes)||4.1|
Critic ReviewsMobyRanks are listed below. You can read here for more information about MobyRank.
The Games Machine (UK) (Dec, 1989)
To describe a game with the depth of RTK is impossible in this limited space. There are a couple of slight quirks in the gameplay (weapons cost the same no matter how many men you have, for example), but they cannot tarnish the quality of this product.
Computer Gaming World (CGW) (Oct, 1990)
A simulation of the unification of China. Using the same system as Nobunaga's Ambition and Genghis Khan, it emphasizes aspects of roleplaying to a larger degree than the former product.
Computer Gaming World (CGW) (Sep, 1988)
Romance of the Three Kingdoms is a great historical simulation and will keep players at their keyboards for many a night in order to win their empires. It has economics, intrigue, bribery, covert action, diplomacy, war, and more! There are many ways beyond simple conquest to accomplish one's goals. I most heartily recommend Romance to all serious game players out there.