Inside
Description official descriptions
Inside is a cinematic platformer with many game mechanics similar to the developer's previous game Limbo. The player controls a young boy and it starts with no context as he climbs down a rock at night in a dark forest. There are no conversations or explanations in the game, but the events reveal it is set in a dystopian universe where sinister experiments are performed on humans or human-like creatures. As in Limbo the boy needs to solve environment based puzzles, hide from people and animals, escape in chase sequences and complete sections with platform mechanics. The boy moves in a hostile environment and cannot be spotted, but it is not explained if he escaped or deliberately seeks out the mystery.
There is no HUD and controls are limited to movement, jumping, and grabbing objects to operate them or to move them around. Progress often involves trial and error to test different options as every challenge usually requires a new approach. He dies often and at times in gruesome ways. The boy can operate elevators, climb or swing from chains and ropes, swim underwater, operate a tiny submarine and so on. There is also a mechanic involving mind control to control other characters. Later on in the game a small group of characters can be gathered and they follow him around automatically. They can help him lift doors or push objects, or throw him in the air. There are no hints, so the player always needs to figure out what to do and where to go.
Similar to Limbo the game has a dark environment, but here with sparse use of colour. Checkpoints are activated automatically and chapters can be revisited at any moment using a menu. Optionally certain hidden objects can be located and disabled, along with an alternate ending to discover. There is a lot of suspense and tense moments in the game, but also scenes that focus entirely on solving a puzzle with no pressure.
Groups +
Screenshots
Promos
Credits (Windows version)
112 People (51 developers, 61 thanks) · View all
Created by | |
Directed by | |
Audio Director | |
Producer | |
Lead Gameplay Designer | |
Animator | |
Executive Producers | |
Visual Development | |
Environment Art | |
Design | |
VFX Artist | |
Technical Artist | |
Gameplay Designers | |
Composers | |
Sound Designers | |
Audio Programmer | |
Technical Director | |
[ full credits ] |
Reviews
Critics
Average score: 90% (based on 112 ratings)
Players
Average score: 3.7 out of 5 (based on 51 ratings with 2 reviews)
The Good
+ Amazing visuals and atmosphere
-
Lots of visual variety
-
Intuitive, clever puzzles
-
Intriguing narrative
The Bad
- Some sections drag the pace down -
Overpriced relative to its length
The Bottom Line
The game opens on a young boy in a forest who begins journeying forwards through a dark and surreal landscape. Along the way, he solves numerous physics puzzles, avoids traps and encounters strange and vile creatures, most of whom probably want to kill him.
That was a very general description of Danish developer Playdeadâs 2010 cinematic platformer, Limbo, but it could just as easily apply to their recently released followup, Inside. This game follows exactly the same recipe as Limbo, to the point where you could easily mistake it for a sequel if you didnât know the gameâs title. Playdead have added a few new ingredients to spice up the dish and give it its own distinct flavor, but by and large Inside serves up a very similar meal to its predecessor.
Story wise, Inside does away with the abstract (some might say symbolic) and fantasy aspects of Limbo in favor of a more straightforward science fiction tale. Despite this, or maybe perhaps because of it, Inside offers up a greater sense of mystery than its predecessor. It starts off with the protagonist being hunted by strange men with dogs. Later on, he infiltrates a laboratory where bizarre mind control experiments are being performed on children like him. What, exactly is going on? Who are the people doing experiments? What purpose do the experiments serve? What is the boyâs part to play in this? These questions are punctuated, and perhaps answered by an absolutely bonkers finale, to say the least. Itâs no exaggeration to say that Inside has one of the craziest endings in the history of gaming, and people will be talking about it for years to come. I donât think everybody will be on-board with where Inside ultimately goes, but it is vastly more fulfilling than Limboâs non-ending. Personally, I loved it for both its inventiveness and sheer audacity.
Arguably the biggest difference between Limbo and Inside is the visuals. Both games have a very angular and jagged art style, but where Limbo was entirely 2D and black and white, Inside makes occasional use of color and is a 2.5-D game. Some of Insideâs puzzles and mechanics make use of the added z-axis, most notably during some of the high-octane chase sequences. While Inside does run in the Unity engine, its visuals are so much more polished than most games using the engine that youâd almost never guess. This is a gorgeous game filled with great use of particle effects, striking camera work, and effective lighting. Despite its use of primarily flat-shaded polygons, the game packs in a ton of detail. Animations, always an important part of a cinematic platformer, are procedurally generated based on physics, and they look fantastic. I especially like how the boy appears to almost trip as he lurches forward into a sprint. Thereâs a lot of variety in settings, from dark forests and rainy farms, to sun-dappled rooftops and underwater laboratories with reversed water. Itâs always an intriguing game to look at. I love the gameâs use of camera and perspective shifts to give the game a sense of scale and spectacle that was sorely missing from Limbo. The camera shifts also help to subtly guide the player during certain key moments.
Inside places a greater emphasis on stealth than Limbo had. Often times, youâll need to avoid being detected by guards with flashlights or robots with spotlights. One particularly memorable sequence has the protagonist join the assembly line of children at the lab, where the player must walk and act as they do to avoid raising enemy suspicion. At the end of the sequence, the protagonist gets discovered, kicking off a chase sequence that includes what may be the most satisfying window jump ever featured in a video game.
Unlike Limbo, the protagonist is capable of swimming, though he canât do it for very long. Youâll often need to jump in water to avoid enemies, grab an object, or fit through a passageway. Later on, you gain access to a bathysphere which allows for submarine-like travel and can dash to push and break obstacles.
The other major new mechanic is the inclusion of mind-controlled characters. You can jump into an orange-lit helmet to take control of multiple characters in the background. Some puzzles will have you switch back and forth between using a helmet and jumping over obstacles yourself. It all makes for even more complex puzzles than Limbo had. Some reviews online have said that Inside has easier puzzles than Limbo, but honestly, both games feel roughly the same in terms of difficulty to me, with Inside maybe having slightly tougher puzzles.
The sound design of Inside is superb. Inside is a mostly quiet game punctuated by loud and startling bursts of noise whenever something dramatic happens. The game knows precisely when to let its moody, atmospheric soundtrack play Occasionally, all noises will be drowned out by the protagonistâs heavy breathing as he breaks into a full-blown sprint. Itâs an eerie and haunting soundscape that demands a good pair of headphones to fully experience.
There were one or two sections that I felt dragged on a little too long. In particular, I felt like the game made too much use of swimming and underwater areas in its second half, which sometimes slowed down the gameâs pace. There were times when objects that I needed to pick up or pull were hidden in dark areas, making them difficult to see. I also felt that the game could have helped out when using the helmets, as you need to press a specific button combination for a good length of time to actually let go of one. Inside gives you no information about the controls whatsoever, not even button prompts. Inside is also a very short game, only taking about 4-5 hours for a first playthrough, but thatâs a typical trait of most games in this genre so I wonât hold that against Playdead. I felt that the game was as long as it needed to be. At $20 though, I felt that it was a tad overpriced when considering how short it is. Still, I can't deny that those hours were extremely well spent.
Inside is an extremely polished and nearly perfectly executed game, and one of the best in its genre in recent memory. Itâs just as atmospheric, puzzling, and intense as its predecessor, while delivering a more interesting narrative. While it is pretty much Limbo 2.0, thatâs not a bad thing since its arguably the better game of the two. The gaming world could always use more cinematic platformers, and Playdead are clearly talented at creating them. I hope they donât take an entire console generation for their next project, but if itâs even half as good as this, the wait will definitely be worth it.
Windows · by krisko6 (814) · 2016
Simple but with great atmosphere
The Good
The game has a great atmosphere. It makes you go on and on to find out what is going on. The graphics and sound are simple but, as said, give a great atmosphere. The physics feel very real.
The Bad
Maybe, as a small point of attention, I would have liked a bit more story. But on the other hand, it's sort of the point of the game.
The Bottom Line
A puzzle side scroller/platformer with fantastic atmosphere.
Nintendo Switch · by Leon Tiggelman (23) · 2018
Trivia
Awards
- The Game Awards
- 2016 â Game of the Year â Nominated
- 2016 â Best Narrative â Nominated
- 2016 â Best Art Direction â Won
- 2016 â Best Music/Sound Design â Nominated
- 2016 â Best Independent Game â Won
Analytics
Upgrade to MobyPro to view research rankings!
Related Sites +
-
TrueAchievements achievement guide
The TrueAchievements achievement guide for Inside
Identifiers +
Contribute
Are you familiar with this game? Help document and preserve this entry in video game history! If your contribution is approved, you will earn points and be credited as a contributor.
Contributors to this Entry
Game added by Sciere.
Nintendo Switch added by Kam1Kaz3NL77. Macintosh added by Ms. Tea.
Additional contributors: Havoc Crow, Bart Smith, Kennyannydenny.
Game added July 9, 2016. Last modified January 24, 2024.