Moby ID: 1842
Windows Specs
Note: We may earn an affiliate commission on purchases made via eBay or Amazon links (prices updated 5/12 6:05 PM )
Included in

Description official descriptions

It's 2160, and the Eastern Alliance has launched a surprise attack on the Western Coalition's fleet and decimated it. The call has gone out for volunteers to become Alliance fighter pilots, and you have signed up with the 45th Volunteer Squadron.

Designed by Chris and Erin Roberts, the creative force behind the Wing Commander/Privateer megaseries, this space fighting simulation features the genre's standard mission types: escort, fighter sweep, interception, attacking space stations, fighting in asteroid fields, etc.

12 pilotable fighters (you can choose which you fly as well as missile loadout, but not all are available in the early missions), 9 enemy fighter types.


  • 星际枪骑兵 - Chinese spelling (simplified)

Groups +



Credits (Windows version)

72 People · View all



Average score: 81% (based on 43 ratings)


Average score: 4.0 out of 5 (based on 49 ratings with 5 reviews)

Engaging gameplay, but the story is not.

The Good
The gameplay in Starlancer is remembered as fast paced and frenetic at times. There's a Wing Commander V school of design here, where gameplay was the focus. Attack and escort missions were strewn about as with any space shooter while the games background story was available to the player via broadcast transmissions in your quarters aboard ship.

The graphics didn't seem to be taxing to my computer at the time, so it should run like a dream on current Windows systems. Definitely a step above the Wing Commander games, but maybe not as intense as Descent: Freespace or its successors.

The Bad
Unfortunately, the story did not seem as involving as previous efforts by it's spiritual predecessor (obviously, the Wing Commander series). The reason I enjoyed "Wing Commander III: Heart of the Tiger" and "Wing Commander IV: The Price of Freedom" was for their engaging cinematics in between and during missions. Starlancer takes a lighter production approach and incorporates the story into very brief cutscenes - I did complete the game, but unfortunately I wasn't impressed.

The Bottom Line
Starlancer is a solid effort in the way of gameplay and missions, but falls short in keeping the player engaged or involved in the story. Those who crave less of the movies (a la the later games in the Wing Commander series) in their space shooters may find more meat in the gameplay here.

Windows · by James P. Wong (2402) · 2004

Definitely flashier and better, but nothing new here...

The Good
Great graphics... The ships look better than just about anything out there. The weapons effects are GOOD, with missile trails, ship engine flares, and more. Even your bunk has animated graphics. The local jump AND the warp gates are quite cool also.

The Bad
After a while, the extra touches gets distracting. Instead of comm screen comes on like with a bit of static, you get a "morphing" graphic icon THEN the video. You also get "transition movies" as you move from one section to another (and you can't turn it off, just "skip" it with a mousepress).

The mouth also don't sync with the words except in the pre-rendered movies.

The Coalition vs. Alliance storyline is about as old as you can get (where Coalition is USSR and China while Alliance is Europe+US+Japan).

There's NOTHING new here. You kill torpedoes, escort ships, kill enemy fighters, some of which can cloak, you kill turrets, etc. etc. etc. All of this has been done before, and Starlancer doesn't add ANYTHING to the genre. Even the plotline features your standard "kill the traitors" twist.

Some of the missions are also horribly hard, and if you fail the later hard part, you must endure the earlier EASY parts again (which could still take up to 7-10 minutes) just to fail again at the hard part. There is no provision to skip the mission after X attempts.

The Bottom Line
Starlancer is basically your next evolution of the space combat genre... With flashier than ever graphics, and not much else. It is essentially a flashier Wing Commander, and that's about all it is.

Starlancer is about the 45th Volunteers, called to duty after the "Pearl Harbor in space" where the Coalition fleet with its cloaked fighters staged a full surprise attack on the peace conference and the Alliance fleet. The 45th started as a scartch outfit, but would eventually help win the war by performing some of the most daring missions in the war, but I get ahead of myself... Initially you are assigned to the ANS Reliant, an old carrier reactivated for the war.

You start in your bunk. You can access your terminal, combat sim, your bunk for your medals or news, and even a "CD player". The graphics quite good as you can sort of "see" things from your viewpoint as if you move around.

When you go to the briefing, your "walk through" the corridors to the briefing room, and watch your squadron commander give the briefing of objectives.

Starlancer gives you the choice of choosing from available fighters based on your clearance level and customize your weapons loadout. As you advance in rank, you will get access to better fighters. Fighters are rated on acceleration, top speed, agility, amount of afterburner fuel, internal guns, and more.

The slightly new twist here is you can load "fuel pods", which would give you additional afterburner fuel. On the other hand, the missiles are still limited to your standard dumbfire, rockets, fast lock, slow lock, disabler, and such. Nothing really new here except a "shield buster" missile.

After that, you see a cutscene of you and your wingmen run for the boarding area, and you start in the cockpit. (All crafts are two-seaters)

The ship is then dropped into space similar to the way Babylon 5 launches its Starfuries (but you only get to watch). You then use a "local jump" drive to jump to the next jump point. You fight enemies by shooting your main guns or launch missions. You also have a special key to target torpedoes and/or bombers if they are present. Some ships have "blind fire", which is basically a limited-auto-aimming gun. All ships have "shot predictor" that will lead the target properly, but those with blind-fire will actually point the gun toward the shot predictor within the narrow cone that it can instead of requiring you to do so. There are also a few other special devices in the game, such as reverse thruster (sudden stop or fly backwards), spectral shields (limited duration energy shield), and even cloak (only on certain ships).

You can also adjust energy among engines, guns, and shields if you choose to do so, with obvious benefits and drawbacks. You also get ECM (which disrupts enemy target lock-on, but limited duration) and Countermeasures (chaff packs) that is supposed to draw off enemy missiles fired at you.

The ships are protected by both armor and shields. Shields regenerate, armor doesn't... Your standard stuff, nothing new here.

Combat is your typical "a few ships against everybody" type missions. While you are usually launched as a wing (with up to 5 other fighters), and they seem to hold their own in combat, they don't get too many kills. You will make kills at 10-20 per mission, and you never see any of your wingmen get on the killboard.

As mentioned before, some of the missions require you to shoot torpedoes, and you need to target them and shoot them ASAP to protect your ships. As torpedoes are usually launched in huge salvoes (up to 6 per bomber, with virtually NO locking) kill torpedoes is NOT fun, esp. when they've passed you and are now approaching your ships and you're in a tailchase.

Most missions have primary and secondary objectives, but often the secondary objectives are not stated or even mentioned. If you accomplish the secondary objectives you will get a great debriefing. If you don't... You get not-bad, bad, or even disgusting debriefing. Your mission log will explain what you may have missed, but it's in a paragraph format with no clear points on how to accomplish them.

Some of the missions also have a "Shoot the Hole" mission. For example, there's a mission where you need to blow the cover off of a base vent, then fire a missile into it to blow up the base. Of course, you need to blow up all the turrets nearby first. Does this start to sound familiar? Imagine then you get to do this again, then again!

Shooting turrets on ships and bases gets old VERY quickly, as are shooting torpedoes that just keep coming. There's almost no way you can shoot the bombers first, so you're always on the defensive, and turret hunting is just a matter of precise aimming, not much there.

All in all, the extra graphical touches in the game helped the game on some levels, but is distracting in other levels. The gameplay is virtually the EXACT same as Wing Commander or Freespace. Indeed, a lot fo the cockpit elements look a LOT like the ones in Freespace, but without the customizability or the usability features like the way FS2 tracks the ships you must protect.

Starlancer also fails to take full advantage of the storyline. The missions aren't that interesting to start with, and feels like an odd combination of Wing Commander: Prophecy and Freespace 2, but with Russians versus Americans instead of Terrans versus Kilrathi or Shivans. There's nothing new in Starlancer at all.

Windows · by Kasey Chang (4591) · 2002

Fair game, at best...

The Good
I loved the fact that Digital Anvil tried to capture a lot of Wing Commander's magic on this game. The pre-briefing interface lends a lot to Origin's "Commander" series, and there's a lot of information to go through as well (constantly evolving news, squad information, pilot information, kill board). It seems the team spend some time trying to make this game complex.

The Bad
Complex does not mean deep. And depth is exactly what this game lacks. The storyline and the mission are so generic you cannot get involved in it. Your character is also a nameless guy, and your able to create a callsign and choose from male or female, but it's about as far as you can go. They went for pre-rendered sequences to display characters, which adds a lot to the generic feel of it all. Controls are not that good, and there is so much different functions that you get lost in them. Again, complex isn't a good thing every time. The same Digital Anvil came up with the relatively complex game Freelancer, with ridiculously simple controls that worked great. At least they learned their lesson. Graphics aren't so hot, and neither is the sound. Voice-acting is awful, by the way, with faked (terribly) foreign accents (german and russian are bad, but the japanese is offensive).

The Bottom Line
Unless you must possess everything that Chris Roberts designs, stay away from this game. Pick up an old copy of Wing Commander 3 and you'll be better off.

Windows · by tbuteler (3021) · 2003

[ View all 5 player reviews ]


The Starlancer demo includes two missions not in the main game, which function as a prequel to the game. You fly from the ANS Yamato and are witness to the sneak attack by the Coalition forces.


MobyPro Early Access

Upgrade to MobyPro to view research rankings!

Related Games

Released 2003 on Windows
Released 2022 on Windows
Star General
Released 1996 on DOS, Windows
Released 2017 on PlayStation 4
Released 2003 on Windows
Star Trek: Starfleet Academy
Released 1997 on Windows, Macintosh
Starsiege: Tribes
Released 1998 on Windows
Super Star Path
Released 2015 on Windows, Macintosh, 2019 on Nintendo Switch
Released 1999 on Windows

Related Sites +

Identifiers +

  • MobyGames ID: 1842
  • [ Please login / register to view all identifiers ]


Are you familiar with this game? Help document and preserve this entry in video game history! If your contribution is approved, you will earn points and be credited as a contributor.

Contributors to this Entry

Game added by Bill Stepec.

Dreamcast added by haydn dalton.

Additional contributors: Raphael, Terok Nor, Unicorn Lynx, Independent.

Game added June 30, 2000. Last modified March 31, 2024.