Rise of Nations
Description official descriptions
Rise of Nations is a real-time strategy game which covers a long period of time, from the early stone age up to the modern-day technology.
The game offers many unique features that you can not find in other RTS games, such as: National Borders, Rare Resources, "Conquer the World" risk-like campaign, Citizens can occupy themselves, 18 Historical Nations (with unique powers/units), Multiple victory conditions, and many more. Also, a multi-player mode is included and offers a ranking system.
Spellings
- å½å®¶ēå“čµ· - Simplified Chinese spelling
- ēåēččµ· - Traditional Chinese spelling
Groups +
Screenshots
Promos
Videos
Add Trailer or Gameplay Video +1 point
See any errors or missing info for this game?
You can submit a correction, contribute trivia, add to a game group, add a related site or alternate title.
Credits (Windows version)
147 People (127 developers, 20 thanks) · View all
Game Design | |
Production | |
Programming | |
Art and Animation | |
[ full credits ] |
Reviews
Critics
Average score: 86% (based on 39 ratings)
Players
Average score: 3.9 out of 5 (based on 55 ratings with 4 reviews)
The Good
As many did, I waited for this game for months looking for the new AOE style game, AOM and EE didnāt make it for me but this one is great and has the potential to...
I like:
1) How were implemented the rare resources and the nation borders from the Civilization series.
2) The mix between RTS and TBS.
3) The diversity on civilizations and their bonuses.
4) The fact that multiplayer works great not as many games ship these days.
5) The fact that scores isnāt fully related to military therefore the last player can have the strongest army and win the game.
6) The fact that you can (recommended) add generals and supply wagons to your army.
7) The risk-like campaign is great.
The Bad
A few points but letās go...
1) As a strategy lover I feel that techs are researched to fast and after 30 mins of game you are at the latest ages... I donāt ask for slow developments like you have in a TBS but I dislike the fast ones.
2) The fact that first player to reach nuclear power have a big advantage at that point.
3) The fact that if your capital is taken by enemy and you can't recover it on 5 mins you are out and the total of your cities are now part of your enemy nation.
The Bottom Line
If you like RTS is a must-have, if you like TBS and never tried RTS because the differences this one can be a great start.
If you like Multiplayer games this one is for you and if you prefer single player the risk-like campaign will provide you hours of fun...
Windows · by Cabeza2000 (689) · 2003
The Good
This combined the visual appeal and "niftyness" value of the better RTS games with the large-scale feeling of a Civilization-style game. Unlike far too many in the genre, you don't have to out-click a computer to play single-player, and the game design makes actual strategic decision-making - longer-term planning and choices - crucial to play. It's also missing most of the worst annoyances of the genre, like stupid units that don't react when under attack and a race to create an uber-unit rush. It even manages to capture the scope and feeling of a great strategic game like Civilization, where your cities really feel like cities and not just bases - heck, it even has Wonders of the World. The single-player "Conquer the World" campaign is also really great, a more-than-decent real strategy game that uses the RTS module for tactical battles.
The Bad
Although the variety of nations support various play styles and give several good choices for most player styles, eventually you do reach the point where games start feeling pretty much the same and there's nothing more to play. Also, sadly, in the CTW campaign the real-world starting locations don't mix very well with the list of nations chosen; the worst case of this is probably the Maya, who have a very nice power in the RTS game but start in a basically hopeless location in the campaign.
The Bottom Line
Although the seminal title in the genre, Dune, was an original idea and I played it as such, most of these games vary from boring to unplayable for me. RoN is only one of two that I've played since Dune that I actually liked, and it's the only one I've ever got enthused about. It also accomplishes something I thought impossible - it actually renders much of the flavor of a Civ game into the RTS genre.
Windows · by weregamer (155) · 2003
Age of Empires meets Civilizationā¦FINALLY!
The Good
The aforementioned summary describes a wonderful game hybrid, which Iāve been dreaming about for the better part of a decade; the chess-like strategy of Civilization mixed with the intense real-time combat of Age Of Empires, which Microsoft and Big Huge Games seem to have achieved with ease.
The real-time portion of the game will be spent in the Age of Empires-like universe. From Age of Empires, the easy-to-read, no-nonsense interface has been utilized when it comes to advancing through the ages, creating/moving units, constructing buildings, and gathering resources. This in my opinion was always the Age seriesā best feature. Even a complete novice could grasp this system with no problem. Also, the buildings, unit animations, and overall appearance will very much remind one of the Age series (which is to be expected since Microsoft published the game). Logically, the turn-based part of the game gives a nod to the Civilization series, where we have a āworld mapā, in which the player has the option of moving their armies in for attack/occupation, and conducting diplomatic business with other nations, and purchasing territories. There is also of course a āturnā button, where the player can decide whether they want to attack a location, or skip out on battle altogether and receive money for it from military surplus. As strange as this may sound, itās almostā¦almostā¦possible to the play the entire game without fighting, much like in Civilization. But hey, whereās the fun in that?
It should also be mentioned that even when in real-time mode (or āAge modeā if you like), the concept of nation borders and city construction is vital to winning the scenario. The more cities you build, the larger your nation borders will become, just like in Civilization (the borders can also be extended by constructing buildings such as castles). Enemy units and the playerās units can also suffer attrition damage when crossing over an opposing nationās border. Excellent!
The Bad
Sadly, even my dream strategy game has a flaw or two, like any game does. For one thing, I found the time limits to be a bit annoying. Occasional time limits are acceptable when it applies to the victory conditions, such as preventing the opposing nation from finishing a Wonder for instance, but a time limit in every scenario is unnecessary. Much of the time I felt rushed, blazing through my research and scrounging for every single bit of resources I could find before the damned clock ran out. It didnāt really allow for careful city planning, so my nation ended up being scatterbrained in a number of ways, with my poor little trade caravans running all over the place. In addition to this, there were times when I thought the āAge modeā was a bit too easy, even at high difficulty settings. In no time, I would have the opposing nationās borders run over and taking out their cities one by one, killing their units and stealing resources in the process. I donāt know if itās an AI issue or what, but the opposing nations oftentimes didnāt seem all that assertive in protecting themselves from my wrath (including nuclear strikes). Oh well. Of course a game like this is a fairly new thing, so hopefully this type of game design will be improved in the future.
The Bottom Line
In conclusion, this is a game that will win over all sorts of converts. Novices, RTS fans that hate TBS, TBS fans that hate RTS, or gamers that donāt care for strategy at all; I believe that theyāll all find something to love in this game. Also, it has enormous replay value, be it single player or multiplayer. As another reviewer said, this is indeed the next-generation strategy game, and I hope other strategy franchises take note of this truly awesome game, because it is a force to be reckoned with.
Windows · by BJ Hoskins (9) · 2003
Trivia
1001 Video Games
Rise of Nations appears in the book 1001 Video Games You Must Play Before You Die by General Editor Tony Mott.
Awards
- 4Players
- 2003 ā Best PC Strategy Game of the Year
- Computer Games Magazine
- March 2004 - #5 Game of the Year
- GameSpy
- 2003 ā #7 PC Game of the Year
- 2003 ā PC RTS Game of the Year
- 2011 ā #19 Top PC Game of the 2000s
- PC Gamer
- April 2005 - #36 in the "50 Best Games of All Time" list
Online servers
The game's online servers which were hosted on GameSpy were shut down on 5 December 2012.
Analytics
Upgrade to MobyPro to view research rankings!
Related Sites +
-
Big Huge Games - Rise of Nations
Official Website from game developer
Identifiers +
Contribute
Are you familiar with this game? Help document and preserve this entry in video game history! If your contribution is approved, you will earn points and be credited as a contributor.
Contributors to this Entry
Game added by Frederic Hutow.
Additional contributors: PCGamer77, Unicorn Lynx, Indra was here, Cabeza2000, Paulus18950, Patrick Bregger, Plok, FatherJack.
Game added May 21, 2003. Last modified March 4, 2024.