Sid Meier's Civilization V
$6.00 used, $9.99 new on eBay
Description official descriptions
Sid Meier's Civilization V is the fifth game in this long-lived series, placing the player in control of a nascent civilization at the dawn of time and challenging them to rise to global dominance, through peaceful or military means. Beginning with a single settler to found a city, players are tasked with exploring their surroundings, growing their empire, researching new technologies to aid them, and negotiating with other, rival civilizations - trading with them, forming alliances and pacts, or waging war.
While the basic concepts of this game are broadly similar to previous games in the series, some major changes have been made. Chief among these is a change from the squares-based map of all previous Civilization games to a hexagon-based system; now, moving in a diagonal offers the same movement as in any other direction (as opposed to a squares-based system, where a diagonal is strictly faster than either vertically or horizontally). In addition, religions have been removed from the game, while the policies system - allowing the player to customise their rule, gaining various perks or bonuses - has been significantly overhauled, requiring players to purchase policies with culture. Ranged units have also been tweaked, allowing archers to bombard enemy units or cities from afar.
- Цивилизация 5 - Russian informal spelling
- 文明帝國 V - Chinese spelling (traditional)
- Game feature: Hexagonal map
- Game with creator's name
- Gameplay feature: Fog of war
- Games with downloadable official map/level editors
- Games with official modding tools
- Games with randomly generated environments
- Green Pepper releases
- Middleware: Fork Particle
- Middleware: Granny 3D
- Middleware: Nvidia 3D Vision
- Protagonist: Female (option)
- Scripting language: Lua
- Setting: Totality of history
- Sid Meier's Civilization series
- Sid Meier's licensees
- Sound engine: AIL/Miles Sound System
- Theme: Famous politician
Credits (Windows version)
550 People (504 developers, 46 thanks) · View all
|CEO / President
|Studio Art Directors
|Director of Software Development
|Director of Marketing
|Human Resources Director
|[ full credits ]
Average score: 89% (based on 83 ratings)
Average score: 3.9 out of 5 (based on 67 ratings with 1 reviews)
There is a lot of depth in this game and many different ways to play it, I often found it very useful to take my time when deciding what building to build next or if I should spend money to buy more ground or if I should trade it with other nations. Each choice can count when you are playing with people who are just as good or better as you, even when playing against people who are worse it's impossible to just mess-around. You really need to think about your actions and that is a good thing when it comes to strategy games.
It looks very good compared to the other Civ games out there, it isn't really that great compared to games like Call of Duty, but there there is no reason to complain either. I actually thought the more realistic style was a great refreshment after the cartoony-style in Civ: Revolution, it just looks way better when you are playing a strategy game of this size. The fights are still very good-looking and there was more attention to detail when looking at the units. Finally I want to mention the pictures of buildings and wonders that you get to see after building them, they are simply amazing and whoever designed them deserves a raise.
There is some really clever ways this game tries to educate people, I was very amused when I saw that Elizabeth was the leader of England and choosing her nation gave you a faster movement speed over water, this of course refers to the many expeditions that happened during her rule. It's really a good sign for a game when it makes me want to look-up information on people like "Catherine of Russia", I like Russia, so after playing as them I wanted to know more about this person who was apparently more interesting than Stalin or Lenin.
I personally think sending units to an enemy capital because word got around that they have an atomic bomb much more engaging than actually standing on the field with the guns. There are far more surprises and there is a lot of suspense, I have to hope he doesn't fire the bomb in order to win the battle for one of my cities that has taken the lives of countless soldiers or that his defenses aren't as strong as they could be. The Civ games are just the perfect strategy game for me and for a lot of other people because they know how to make it just as exciting as any action game in existence.
After one or two playthroughs the game starts to lose it a little, the first time playing it feels like you're actually playing for years, but that doesn't last for very long. I am busy with my fifth round, but everything just feels like a race to the Modern era for me. I know that creating units is pointless because there will be something better in just a few turns and I also know what is important to research and what isn't. This makes it easy for me to just rush through everything and use tanks to pound through enemy soldiers that are still using longbows.
The multi-player is incredibly annoying, I expected a normal round, but with human players instead of AI. What I found instead was a what I presume to be the very first game in this franchise because it was broken beyond belief. My cousin and I were both in the same lobby, but when we started the game we weren't in the same game and were randomly assigned a nation that we didn't pick. The diplomacy was also removed almost entirely and everything was in high-speed, not fun at all, if you can't design a multi-player mode for your game, you shouldn't try to put it in anyway.
The Bottom Line
The reason why I like this Civ game a lot is because it is the first one I ever actually owned. I borrowed two other games in this franchise from family, but this is the first time I could actually sit down and enjoy it without anybody asking their copies back. If you're a fan of the previous games and you already played Civ 4 for a very long time, this sequel will probably not be enough to please you. It adds very little and the only major changes are the City-states and the fact that you can't stack units anymore (which is probably the best update in the history of video games).
People who are new to the franchise or haven't played it a lot (like myself) will probably like this game if they like the franchise or strategy games as a whole. It's a very good single-player game with a lot of replay-value and you are guaranteed to run into some very exciting moments. A bad update, but a great game.
Windows · by Asinine (957) · 2011
- 2010 – #3 Best PC Game of the Year
- 2010 – #3 Best Strategy Game of the Year
- 2010 – PC Game of the Year
- 2010 – Strategy Game of the Year
- Steam Awards
- 2016 — The 'Test of Time' Award — Nominated
Related Sites +
Are you familiar with this game? Help document and preserve this entry in video game history! If your contribution is approved, you will earn points and be credited as a contributor.
Contributors to this Entry
Game added by Vulpine.
Game added January 26, 2011. Last modified February 13, 2024.